"Gather ye rosebuds while ye may,Old Time is still a-flying;And this same flower that smiles today
Tomorrow will be dying."
“Rather than using a single test, of one type, at the end of teaching, effective teacher-assessors gather lots of evidence along the way, using a variety of methods and formats.”
The first part of this quote made me think about Bachman’s definition of assessment seen in class. We have to GATHER evidence of learning from our students in a systematic way, that is to say all along the process and not only at the end of teaching.
There are multiple ways of gathering this precious evidence, not only the classical test and quizzes we are so used to. In fact, “Understanding is revealed in performance, thus, assessment for understanding must be grounded in authentic performance based tasks.”
We have to face our students to real problems that will trigger transfer from their previous experiences. There is no point in creating false situations where both, teachers and students know that its only aim is to assess a determined content and that its future is to be forgotten and never used by the student.
I am also thinking about formative assessment v/s summative assessment. If our final goal is to really use assessment for learning, then we have to systematically gather our students’ weaknesses and strengths in order to later provide them with the necessary feedback they need to improve their performance. If we only assess them at the end of a period, no feedback is possible and as we can read in this week chapter, “Learning is maximized when cycles of perform-feedback-revise-perform guide the production of high quality products.”
Finally I would like to attempt to answer the question “What kind of evidence do we need to find hallmarks of our goals, including that of understanding?
I think our goals are fulfilled and we can claim that our students really UNDERSTOOD when they are truly able to solve real problems using the contents given in class, when they can manipulate information, techniques and even situations to fulfill a task, when the feeling of having solved a real problem is the final taste of our classes.
The first part of this quote made me think about Bachman’s definition of assessment seen in class. We have to GATHER evidence of learning from our students in a systematic way, that is to say all along the process and not only at the end of teaching.
There are multiple ways of gathering this precious evidence, not only the classical test and quizzes we are so used to. In fact, “Understanding is revealed in performance, thus, assessment for understanding must be grounded in authentic performance based tasks.”
We have to face our students to real problems that will trigger transfer from their previous experiences. There is no point in creating false situations where both, teachers and students know that its only aim is to assess a determined content and that its future is to be forgotten and never used by the student.
I am also thinking about formative assessment v/s summative assessment. If our final goal is to really use assessment for learning, then we have to systematically gather our students’ weaknesses and strengths in order to later provide them with the necessary feedback they need to improve their performance. If we only assess them at the end of a period, no feedback is possible and as we can read in this week chapter, “Learning is maximized when cycles of perform-feedback-revise-perform guide the production of high quality products.”
Finally I would like to attempt to answer the question “What kind of evidence do we need to find hallmarks of our goals, including that of understanding?
I think our goals are fulfilled and we can claim that our students really UNDERSTOOD when they are truly able to solve real problems using the contents given in class, when they can manipulate information, techniques and even situations to fulfill a task, when the feeling of having solved a real problem is the final taste of our classes.
